简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Unmasking Ivision Market's deceit: from withholding funds to coercive review demands, the shocking tactics demand heightened investor vigilance in the online trading realm.
In the intricate world of online trading, a disconcerting tale emerges, shedding light on the predicament faced by an investor, Saeed, entangled with Ivision Market. This narrative unravels a sequence of events that turned tumultuous for a trader seeking financial growth but found himself in a distressing situation.
Ivision Market, an online trading platform, is now under scrutiny as Saeed recounts his ordeal, accusing the company of holding his funds under the pretext of damaging their reputation.
Saeed initiated his investment journey by depositing AED 6000 into his Ivision Market account on 7th August 2023. The first withdrawal was attempted on 16th September 2023, but to this day, not a single dirham has found its way to Saeed's account. The promise of financial growth quickly turned into an agonizing wait for his hard-earned funds.
In desperate attempts to resolve the issue, Saeed reached out to Ivision Markets alleged Dubai leader, Mr. Nadeem, multiple times. However, these efforts were in vain as Mr. Nadeem chose to block Saeed's number, leaving him without a means to communicate with the company.
Frustrated and left with no recourse, Saeed resorted to expressing his grievances on WikiFX's Exposure page. A negative review, posted at the beginning of December 2023, stands as a testament to Saeed's dissatisfaction. The screenshot below attests to his attempt to bring attention to his predicament.
In a startling turn of events, Ivision Market's customer service promptly reached out to Saeed, not to address the concerns but to demand the removal of the negative review. The ultimatum was clear – delete the review, and only then would they consider transferring his money.
Saeed, resolute in his pursuit of justice, refused to succumb to the pressure. Despite threats and rude remarks, he stood firm, stating that he would not retract his review until his funds were rightfully returned.
The amount held hostage by Ivision Market amounted to approximately 6317 AED – funds that Saeed rightfully owned but could not withdraw.
The last time Saeed checked his account, he realized that all his funds had been wiped out.
This distressing account reflects the challenges faced by investors dealing with Ivision Market, raising concerns not only about financial transparency but also about the company's response to customer dissatisfaction. The lack of communication, failed withdrawals, and coercive tactics employed by Ivision Market have left Saeed in a state of uncertainty and financial distress.
It is also important to note that this is not the first time Ivision Market has employed such unjust tactics on its users.
If the trader had consulted WikiFX before engaging with Ivision Market, it might have prevented the distressing situation they now find themselves in.
In times of trading disputes, maintaining meticulous records of interactions is paramount. WikiFX's Exposure function can serve as a vital tool for investors facing challenges similar to Saeed's. If you find yourself in a comparable situation, reach out to WikiFX for guidance through the provided channels. The quest for accountability and fairness in online trading remains an ongoing battle, and investors are encouraged to share their experiences to foster a transparent and trustworthy trading environment.
The trader's harrowing experience with Ivision Market serves as a stark reminder of the hurdles that traders may face in the world of online trading. It is essential for traders to be equipped with the right resources and support, especially when confronted with unresolved withdrawal issues. So download your free WikiFX mobile application from Google Play or the App Store now!
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
The main trading dashboard account of a trader for LQH Markets was completely deleted by a broker. The trader is not being offered any access to their funds or profits. This incident shows the risks of trading markets and brokers and the importance of protecting your funds without relying on any broker.
According to report, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) announced today that it has entered into a settlement agreement with ZFN EUROPE Ltd for the amount of €20,000. This settlement resolves a regulatory inquiry into ZFN Europe’s compliance with Cyprus’s Investment Services and Activities and Regulated Markets Law of 2017, as amended.
PrimeXBT launches stock CFDs on MetaTrader 5, offering shares of major U.S. companies with crypto or USD margin for enhanced multi-asset trading.
FXTM and AvaTrade are two well-established online brokers offering forex and CFD trading across global markets. Both enjoy strong reputations and high ratings on WikiFX—FXTM holds an AAA overall rating, while AvaTrade scores 9.49/10, indicating they’re regarded as reliable choices by the community. However, since brokers have great reputation in the industry, how do we know which one is more suitable for individuals to invest in? Today's article is about the comparison between FXTM and AvaTrade.