简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Expert review of the OANDA broker: platforms (Web/Mobile/MT4/TradingView), pricing, leverage rules, pros & cons, and key fees.
For Singapore-based traders who value regulation and platform choice, OANDA delivers a balanced package: MAS oversight, clear pricing options (spread-only or core + commission with USD 3/100k), and a flexible platform stack (Web with TradingView charts, Mobile with 50+ tools, MT4 with EAs, and TradingView connectivity). It also lists bond CFDs—a niche many brokers skip. The trade-offs: strict MAS leverage (good for risk, limiting for high-leverage seekers), non-SGD withdrawal fees, an inactivity fee after 12 months, and a limited crypto roster. We confirmed every claim on the Singapore site or regulators’ pages.
Pros | Cons |
Multi-jurisdiction regulation (incl. MAS, FCA, ASIC, NFA, FSA JP, CIRO) builds trust. | MAS retail leverage caps (e.g., ~20:1 majors) restrict high-leverage strategies. |
Transparent pricing incl. USD 3/100k core model; core spreads from 0.0 on majors. | Non-SGD withdrawal fees: USD 20 first/month, USD 35 later that month. |
Platform breadth: OANDA Web (TradingView), Mobile (50+ tools), MT4 + EAs, TradingView direct trading. | Inactivity fee after 12 months (up to SGD 10/mo). |
Methodology note: We rely on primary sources (regulators & OANDA SG site) and avoid hype. We label opinions as such, and you can verify every cited line via the links. This page is informational, not investment advice.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.